Leadership: you don't need a sex change

Published: 2011-02-12   There are 14 comments ... please add yours below

You can exercise the best of both “ male” and “female’ leadership attributes
ignoring the assumption that your capabilities are limited by your gender

Michael Wallent (an 11-year Microsoft veteran) and Megan Wallent (a co-worker) couldn’t be more different. One is a man; the other a woman. Each, we are told by Harvard Business Review*, demonstrates the classic “male” or “female” leadership traits. Michael has the engineer’s narrow-gauge logic and bluntness. Megan shows sensitivity and inclusion. The HBR explains wide-eyed (at its own permissiveness, I sense) that Michael and Megan are actually the same person – pre and post a sex change. Do you dare to read on?

For over four decades, I’ve operated in various types of organisations – both as leader and follower. As an inside executive and an external consultant. With both for-profit and not-for-profit enterprises. Across industries from agriculture to waste management and from the arts to venture capital. So, what is my take on the HBR article? Simplistic nonsense to put it mildly.

I’ve worked with plenty of male leaders, who exhibit so-called feminine traits such as openness, empathy and intuition – even to excess. I’ve equally worked with women, who metaphorically ripped the appendages off their co-workers. So, what are my lessons?

  • Leadership has nothing to do with your gender – or anyone else’s. As leader, you’re secondary in the leadership equation. It’s about your followers – and their needs. So, if gender were important at all, it would be theirs, not yours, that merited attention.
  • Leadership is not about a set of right or wrong behaviours. It’s about working out what actions are needed from you (by your followers) to address their concerns and challenges in their current situation. If the business is under siege, it may be a time for speed and ruthless choices. Kindness, consideration and healing may have to wait. Or, vice versa.
  • Leadership isn’t about attributes but about actions. You can be an archetypal engineer (I’m one!) yet still learn to take leadership actions that operate against your default tendencies. I was (and remain) heavily driven by facts and logic but have learnt to consider others’ feelings. Reading body language to check how I’m coming across, engaging different people differently and so on. Equally, I know women with natural intuition and insight, who (in order to succeed) have had to learn to analyse and toughen their decision-making.
  • Leadership is not about compensating but finding flexibility. We are all susceptible to criticism – particularly of our weaknesses. The Harvard Business School is a great institution, which I’m proud to have attended. I fear, though, that in its portrayal of the Wallent story, it is the “male engineer” over-responding to a self-image of insensitivity. Equal opportunity and absence of gender bias are goals to aim for. But, assuming gender predetermines behaviour is a generalisation too far.

At the risk of offending: in leadership, each of us has to be transgender. What do you think?

* “How to transcend the transgender debate” from Harvard Business School Publishing – reprinted in the Australian Financial Review, Jan. 8-9, 2011

Would you like to reproduce this Potshot? See License Terms



Dr. Timothy Pascoe AM
PhD (Cambridge), MBA (Harvard), BE & BEc (Adelaide)
Creator, V|E|C|T|O|R Leadership®



Name
*will be displayed beside your comment
Email address
*won't be displayed
Comment
Conditions of posting: please feel free to post your views, but note that any post that is defamatory, contains bad language, or is spam will be blocked and deleted.
*
Email me when other comments are posted

Fields marked with * are required

Comments (14)

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/02/22 11:27 am


Dear Phadke,

Thanks, as always, for your enthusiasm and commitment to leadership. It's great to be in touch.

Timothy

Phadke Subodhkumar Narayan - date: 2011/02/22 12:35 am

Namaste sir,

Thanks a lot for sharing this peace of information. This article calls for great homework.

Article & message got a view point. Since I also believe that height + width of 5 fingers of LH do not match with RH fingers. I completely endorse the view point expressed in article.

Yes, thinking process in male & in female are different. Yes at the level of leadership, leader must make an attempt to become master without being biased and keeping the mind open for learning, unlearning & relearning.

Thanks a lot for this post. Thanks a lot for keeping me in your distribution list.

Sincerely I remain,

Phadke S. N.
City: Pune
State: Maharashtra
Country: India

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/02/19 01:38 pm


Dear Joseph,

Good points. Like you, I really like the expression Goodnews employed: gender agnostic.

As you say, we engineers love our equations!

Best,

Timothy

Joseph Mullin, MBA Principal - date: 2011/02/19 01:07 pm

Dear Timothy,

Thank you for the interesting article and viewpoint.

I am not sure that transgender is the correct way to look at this. I refer to Adams comments and Goodnews comment.
I would say that it takes an S and two C's as part of the equation(darn us engineers and our equations).
The S = selfawareness
The first C = Compassion
The second C = Comprehension

A leader must be self aware to avoid what is called the "My way or the highway" syndrome. It keeps them more aware of the followers needs and contributions.
Comprehension of the different cultures, characteristics and styles of your followers will help in the compassion side.
As Goodnews pointed out leadership is gender agnostic.

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/02/16 09:13 am


Dear Adam,

Thanks for your comment - and I fear to go further, since you've already expressed things so well.

Yes, leadership is about the followers not the leader. So, being awake and responsive to their needs and concerns (about the journey ahead, whether it's feasible, where they fit in, etc.) is the job of the leader.

In that sense, leadership is not a fixed attribute you have but a problem-solving capability you exercise. In each situation, working out what actions you need to take so people will want to follow.

The bottom line, as you say, is all about your followers.

Thanks again,

Timothy

Adam Simpson - date: 2011/02/15 05:27 pm

Dear Timothy,

Thank you for those sage words. While perhaps a dangerous invitation to one with so much wisdom to share, you might go further and extend the lesson. Would you go further to say leaders need not only be transgender to accommodate gender differences but ideally need to transcend all the myriad of potential follower differences to lead effectively? In other words, stay focused on the followers and beware of your own lens on life.

Thank you again. Keep up the good work.

Adam

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/02/15 09:47 am


Dear Goodnews,

As you say, it's about being gender agnostic. The challenge for each of us is to develop both sensitivity and the full range of leadership capabilities- "hard" and "soft". This way we can diagnose what a particular situation needs and, respond with actions that are fit for purpose.

Many thanks,

Timothy

Goodnews - date: 2011/02/15 09:27 am

Hi Timothy:

It is certainly about leadership maturity (which is gender agnostic) that will make it easier for us to care for and grow our followers. A certain level of maturity makes it easier to act beyond the need to massage our own egos, but for the sake of the community we serve.

Our ability to observe ourselves, is also not gender-dependent, but comes out of being aware of ourselves, and the impact we are having on to others as leaders.

We can display consistently a character that can withstand the test of resilience, without being a particular gender, but by just being a leader. This will allow us to act decisively, and appropriately, with the intention that is required of the challenge.

I thank you- I also believe Tim, I do not need a sex change, I am OK.

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/02/15 07:25 am


Dear Judi,

Many thanks for that flattering comment. I have to admit though that the inside is often more murky than crystalline. It takes quite a bit of shaping and polishing to get to what you see.

Timothy

Judi Stifel - date: 2011/02/15 03:52 am

Timothy,

Being inside that crystal-clear mind of yours is the best place I can think of being.

Thank you so much for sharing your wealth with us.

Judi :-)

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/02/14 04:18 pm


Many thanks, Ijaz.

Timothy

Ijaz Rana - date: 2011/02/14 03:01 pm

Dear Timothy,
I could not agree more.
Brilliantly explained.
Best Regards.
Ijaz

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/02/14 01:43 pm


Dear John,

Thanks for the comment. As you say, leadership is about learning - continually updating what we do and how we do it. The world doesn't stand still and nor can we.

Gender stereotyping remains in need of attention - in terms of shedding outmoded assumptions. These may have no overt negative intent but may well have negative impact.

All the best,

Timothy

John Kitney - date: 2011/02/14 11:42 am

We can easily get into gender stereotypes. We have learnt them from a very early age. It comes to us very easily. Leadership is about vision and communication and drawing on the best from colleagues. It is also about listening and hearing and modifying direction and strategies where necessary. It is about learning from each other irrespective of gender and moving forward together for a common purpose.


Would you like to reproduce this Potshot?

We encourage people to republish this Potshot online, or in print. However, please take the time to read our License Terms and so that you can properly attribute the republished Potshot