Leadership: when the stakes are really high

Published: 2011-06-03   There are 7 comments ... please add yours below

You can succeed against the odds if your people are convinced as to the merit of their cause
thus not falling prey to moral doubts about the rightness of their actions

Let’s think of some really big challenges. For a nation, it might be fighting a war. Putting citizens’ lives and the state itself at risk. For a business, it might be a takeover. Thus jeopardising the interests of all stakeholders. For an individual, it might be taking leadership of a failing project. Or, of something bigger than they’ve previously experienced. So, which was your notable challenge that succeeded – where you and others were at risk? And, which was the messy failure? Below are five factors needed for success in any project – whether national or personal. But, the last seems particularly critical when things get really tough. Particularly if you’re competing from a weak position. So, let me know what you think.

  1. Capability: any country, business or individual needs analytical, planning and execution skills plus resourcing relevant to their task. You may lack these at first. But to win, you need to get or build them. From a weak start, the Allied forces did this in WWII.
  2. Communication: in any venture, all supporters need to be “in the loop”. Otherwise, rumours replace facts, resources are misallocated and people lose heart. Things fail when different areas don’t know what others are doing. This is common enough but of low cost on minor projects, where slippage may not matter. But, in high-risk ventures, it can be fatal.
  3. Flexibility: few endeavours go to plan: business competitors may attack in unforeseen ways. In war, an enemy may mislead you with a feint. Success starts with deskwork but it succeeds by the quality and speed of your responses as conditions change.
  4. Stamina: contests often take longer than expected. We start saying “it won’t last long” only to find it does. This multiplies costs of all types. So, winners must endure: pushing on and on and on. As is said in Japan: fall down seven times, get up eight.
  5. Legitimacy: ventures that put lives, reputations or careers at risk make us ask: what justifies me facing these dangers? Doubly so if things drag on, as above, and optimism fades. Think of ill-fated projects you’ve been part of, which damaged your standing. Or the appalling cost of mismanaged battles. What’s the answer? From my experience, individuals, teams and organisations are most powerful when certain of their legitimacy. More likely to win, even against the odds. In a recent article, George Friedman of Stratfor* mentions that WWII was “the last war the US fought with a formal declaration of war” – in other words, with proper congressional authority. He believes this has undermined the legitimacy of those that followed – including in the Middle East today.

Succeeding requires some mix of capability, communication, flexibility, stamina and legitimacy. But the higher the stakes and the longer the play, the more legitimacy matters. So, perhaps the key for all of us is this: even before you start, check your legitimacy. All too often, a small beginning can lead to something bigger, longer and much more challenging.

* http://www.stratfor.com/weekly/20110328-what-happened-american-declaration-war

Would you like to reproduce this Potshot? See License Terms



Dr. Timothy Pascoe AM
PhD (Cambridge), MBA (Harvard), BE & BEc (Adelaide)
Creator, V|E|C|T|O|R Leadership®



Name
*will be displayed beside your comment
Email address
*won't be displayed
Comment
Conditions of posting: please feel free to post your views, but note that any post that is defamatory, contains bad language, or is spam will be blocked and deleted.
*
Email me when other comments are posted

Fields marked with * are required

Comments (7)

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/06/25 01:14 am


Dear Joseph,

What a great example - and, as you point out, sometimes even the best performance may not win you the desired outcome.

Many thanks,

Timothy

Joseph Mullin, MBA Principal - date: 2011/06/21 02:38 am

Timothy,
I think mine was on the same project it was a win fail result.
I was a Sr. Test Engineer hired to increase the throughput of a test facility. I was accomplishing that task when I was called to report to another project that was behind schedule and out of control with other issues threatening it.
My manager introduced me as his efficiency expert.
I quickly learned what all the problems were.
Organized a work team of technicians
Ordered all the equipment and supplies needed to get the job done efficiently.
Trying to rein in engineers is like herding cats but with the help from my managers we accomplished it.
Had to become liaison between facility and safety managers who wanted to end the project right then and there.
Regained focus on SOW and started from a 4 week deficit with less than 3 weeks to critical milestone.
At a week and a half into the process a major failure occurred. The cooling system had to be drained disassembled cleaned reassembled and recharged. Set back 4 days. Long hours and a competent crew made the work fast and accurate.
When the milestone hit we were 3 days ahead of schedule. Made a great demonstration of the product but still lost the contract.
I was proud of what I had accomplished and praised my crew for a gallant effort. I was baffled that we lost the contract as our product worked better than the competitors.
Everyone on the project lost their jobs, such is the life in defense contracting.

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/06/10 08:39 am


Dear Phadke,

Many thanks for your kind comment. I like your use of the word MANTRA. I find it useful to have a link word or acronym that reminds me of things I should be doing.

Best wishes,

Timothy

Phadke Subdohkumar Narayan - date: 2011/06/10 12:50 am

Namaste Dr. Timothy Sir,

Thanks a lot for this 5 "Mantra's".

All the five points that you expressed are the need of the time. I hope, billions of Net users reading each & every post of yours and taking their own lesson for their business & for their country.

I thank you for keeping my email ID in trust circle.

I appreciate.

Sincerely I remain,

Phadke S. N.

Phadke Subdohkumar Narayan - date: 2011/06/10 12:48 am

Timothy Pascoe - date: 2011/06/07 01:47 pm


Dear Drew,

You're right: legitimacy is increasingly a problem for many types of organisations - whether in business, politics or even the not-for-profit sector. No one sector has a monopoly on moral behaviour - or its opposite.

Even as individuals, we face the same dilemmas - both in our employment and personal lives. I've known people, who rail against what they see as organisational excesses or misdirected behaviour but engage in personal habits that show little regard for their own physical health or long-term safety.

The congruence of organisational and personal misbehaviour is, I suppose, to be expected. After all, organisations are just congregations of individuals.

Best wishes,

Timothy

Drew Stevenson - date: 2011/06/07 09:46 am

Hi Timothy,

I like the "legitimacy" factor. As consummers we are so bombarded by advertising and spin that the legitimacy of a venture/product/service is often taken for granted.
Add to this a world where values can and do change quickly its not always clear that we are following our moral compass, witness advances in technology, climate change. Businesses can find themselves producing products which are no longer relevent, or the production of which is environmentally reprehensible - all things which can rapidly erode the legitimacy of an enterprize.
The knee-jerk reaction is often to redouble effort instead of trying to re-align - staff often feel, even if they dont see, the lack of a legitimate purpose and that's a slippery slope.


Would you like to reproduce this Potshot?

We encourage people to republish this Potshot online, or in print. However, please take the time to read our License Terms and so that you can properly attribute the republished Potshot